![]() ![]() It let you define your specific machine and ressources settings in one place. The machine configuration file is an optional component. (#onefinity-custom-machine-library-definition) It's a language definition file used to converts toolpaths created in a CAM software into language (NC programs) than can be read by the CNC machine's controller. The post processor file is a mandatory component. (#onefinity-custom-post-library-definition). ![]() ** click on the desired component to get to the proper section It contains these 'Onefinity Customized Components' to be use in 'Autodesk Fusion 360': The 'Fusion' folder is part of 'Onefinity-Post-Processors' GitHub Package. Menu | (#overview) | (#components) | (#procedures) | blaghislain/onefinity-post-processors/blob/main/Fusion/README.md # Onefinity Fusion 360 Post Processor & Machine This reminds me of the days when we use to select HP Laser Jet 5 as the print driver even if we had a different brand laser printer… is this the same kind of thing, should I select a generic 3-axis machine? Sorry to drag this out but I’m completely new to this. But if Onefinity is suppose to be listed as a MACHINE then I’m still lost.Īgain, I’m just trying to figure out the correct Machine selection, not the post processor. But if everyone is selecting say, Autodesk Generic 3-axis as the machine then OK, that would answer my question. Are you saying that by loading the infinity_fusion360.cps file that it should populate both the Machine and the Post Processor? If that’s the case something is not loading correctly for me. Under Manufacture, the first category is Milling and I select Setup, then I select New Setup from the drop down and the very first question is Machine - this is where I do not find Onefinity listed. In the latest release of Fusion 360 (Personal-Not for Commerical Use) version / macOS 10.16.0. The issue I am trying to resolve is not Post Processor selection…its the MACHINE selection. I did follow the instructions which loaded the cps file and it shows up in the Manufacture / Actions / Post Process Dialog box (see attached screenshot I). I will probably love whatever comes out in 2 more years.Well I guess I am still misunderstanding the process. JavaScript was terrible 10 years ago, and then at some point I tried jquery and thought it was neat, and then recently I tried React for the sandify program and I am pretty happy with that. Python is the only other language where I’ve actually picked up enough to know as well as C++. I am just not as familiar as I am with C++. It probably also bothers me how close to C++ it is, without being C++. I don’t actually hate Java, I really don’t like the enormous namespaces and names. ![]() ![]() Most of the time, even smart pointers aren’t needed if you design your objects well. A lot of great features were added in C++11 (a lot of very Pythonic features, IMO). In the case of pointers, you should use smart pointers (std::shared_ptr or boost::shared_ptr) instead. C++ (I don’t have as much experience with C) has many parts that you just shouldn’t use unless you have a very very good reason. Yes, so called “dumb pointers” are very dangerous. I started with 12" legs and have cut them twice again down to 8 1/2" and in the process have over tightened all of the feet. I have already broken the lower piece on the XYZ assembly and had to reprint. Given the nature of 3D I suppose the features are necessary.Īnyway, I love the simplicity of your design but I am am quickly learning the limitations of plastic. The CAM systems like MasterCam and their ilk have taken the fun out of coding. I did CNC programming for Lockheed & Hewlett-Packard for 15 years but it’s been 20 yrs since I have written any tool paths. In the mean time I have Replied in the Fusion 360 PP thread and perhaps can gain some insight there. However, if that’s where you can provide the best advice, then who am I to argue! I’ll take another whack at it tomorrow. This implies that both are code that runs on the board… I presume a modified Arduino.Īs for ESTLCAM goes I was hoping not to have to learn multiple systems. Yes, I bought the board from you but am still a novice on the terminology… so not GRBL… yes Marlin. Thx Ryan… I have been reading the thread about the Fusion post-processor. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |